Re: gettext, plural form and translation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gettext, plural form and translation
Date: 2009-03-19 12:40:39
Message-ID: 25753.1237466439@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
>> If the "(n rows)" is the *only* message that needs it then I think it
>> would be simpler to just make it "(Rows: n)" instead. But I wouldn't
>> be surprised if there were other messages with similar issues.

> There are a few more, e.g.,

> %d index pages have been deleted
> %d connections
> Identifier must be less than %d characters.

What's supposed to happen when a message contains more than one
number (for example, most of the vacuum activity messages)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-03-19 13:29:00 Re: gettext, plural form and translation
Previous Message Shrish Purohit 2009-03-19 09:54:38 Re: Extension of Thick Indexes