Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?
Date: 2021-05-02 18:31:01
Message-ID: 25742a94-aa0d-1595-fe0d-6931e81c1d24@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/2/21 8:46 AM, Pól Ua Laoínecháin wrote:
[snip]
> Now, I'm not quite sure that I completely comprehend matters: Is there
> a difference between Asynchronous I/O and Buffered I/O?

* Asynchronous (a-syn-chron-ous) is an adjective which means "not together
with time".
* Buffered means "read more than you need at the moment, and then do
processing to/from a cache".

They are not mutually exclusive.

Their antonyms are
* Synchronous (syn-chron-ous): together with time.
* Direct, where you read/write only what you need at the moment, directly
to/from the IO device.

Thus, *async* IO is where you tell the IO subsystem that you need something,
and then *go off and do something else*; the IO system interrupts you when
the data has been delivered.
*Sync*hronous IO is where you request IO and then *wait for the data*.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2021-05-02 19:30:18 Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?
Previous Message Vijaykumar Jain 2021-05-02 17:00:07 Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?