Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
Date: 2000-01-24 17:29:43
Message-ID: 25723.948734983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> Things are still not so good for me. The pg_dumpall > file, psql < file did
> work, but later:

> newnham=> select * from crsids,"tblPerson" where
newnham-> crsids.crsid != "tblPerson"."CRSID";
> Backend sent B message without prior T
> D21Enter data to be copied followed by a newline.
> End with a backslash and a period on a line by itself.
>>>

> which smells like a similar problem. (Note that this is a join. Straight
> selects didn't cause problems)

Bizarre. Obviously, the frontend and backend have gotten out of sync,
but it's not too clear who's to blame. Since you also mention

> (New also, though probably unrelated: the sanity check fails with number of
> index tuples exactly half number in heap - not equal)

I think that you may have some subtle platform-specific problems in the
backend.

What exactly is your platform/compiler/configuration, anyway?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-24 17:33:34 Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 17:25:29 Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates