Re: cpu_tuple_cost

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, David Brown <time(at)bigpond(dot)net(dot)au>, Gregory Stark <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cpu_tuple_cost
Date: 2005-03-17 17:57:20
Message-ID: 25691.1111082240@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Yes it is. I ran experiments back in the late 90s to derive it.
>> Check the archives.

> Hmmmm ... which list?

-hackers, no doubt. -performance didn't exist then.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-17 18:15:32 Re: multi-column index
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-03-17 17:54:29 Re: cpu_tuple_cost