Re: Resolved! (was: Re[8]: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolved! (was: Re[8]: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?)
Date: 2000-09-22 01:19:59
Message-ID: 25679.969585599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru> writes:
> It was indeed the problem with opening files - the limit was set
> to 1024 with more than 100 possible backends...

> Well, I suppose it wouldn't hurt to change the error message in
> the future versions of Postgres, 'cause now it is somewhat...
> misleading... ;->

I've tried of late to make sure that all file-open calls in the backend
will include the kernel errno string in their failure error messages.
There may still be a few stragglers but most of 'em should report
something about "too many open files" if they fail.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-09-22 02:17:13 Re: Re: sequences
Previous Message Richard Harvey Chapman 2000-09-22 00:28:03 Re: problem with calling c functions