Re: OS X and ossp-uuid, next chapter

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OS X and ossp-uuid, next chapter
Date: 2014-02-18 16:22:38
Message-ID: 25671.1392740558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> We already know that the uuid-ossp extension doesn't build OS X unless a
>> small patch is applied.
>>
>> This has now gotten slightly worse after the Autoconf upgrade, because
>> it will now fail if a header is present but cannot be compiled.

> Given commit e6170126fc201052b0ec5fc92177eb181d602d26, I think we
> should just remove uuid-ossp from our tree. Somebody can maintain it
> on PGXN if they feel the urge.

I think that's premature, since that commit hasn't shipped yet. Give
people a release or two to switch over.

I'd be good with putting a notice on uuid-ossp saying that it's deprecated
and will be removed soon. Of course, our track record for enforcing such
things is bad, but we gotta start somewhere ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2014-02-18 16:27:08 Re: Do you know the reason for increased max latency due to xlog scaling?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-02-18 16:16:45 Re: OS X and ossp-uuid, next chapter