| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OS X and ossp-uuid, next chapter |
| Date: | 2014-02-18 16:22:38 |
| Message-ID: | 25671.1392740558@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> We already know that the uuid-ossp extension doesn't build OS X unless a
>> small patch is applied.
>>
>> This has now gotten slightly worse after the Autoconf upgrade, because
>> it will now fail if a header is present but cannot be compiled.
> Given commit e6170126fc201052b0ec5fc92177eb181d602d26, I think we
> should just remove uuid-ossp from our tree. Somebody can maintain it
> on PGXN if they feel the urge.
I think that's premature, since that commit hasn't shipped yet. Give
people a release or two to switch over.
I'd be good with putting a notice on uuid-ossp saying that it's deprecated
and will be removed soon. Of course, our track record for enforcing such
things is bad, but we gotta start somewhere ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-02-18 16:27:08 | Re: Do you know the reason for increased max latency due to xlog scaling? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-18 16:16:45 | Re: OS X and ossp-uuid, next chapter |