From: | "Johnson, Heather" <HJohnson(at)nypost(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lee Wu " <Lwu(at)mxlogic(dot)com>, <pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_ctl stop -m fast |
Date: | 2004-10-28 17:24:25 |
Message-ID: | 2563CFA30A899A44BEFF5BC0CB030F7617FC16@NYPEXCH01.NYPOST |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I've seen this happen. I think it happens because we have a Postgres database that is serving multiple webservers getting a high level of traffic. If you try to shut down the database while the webservers are still initiating connections to it, pg_ctl has trouble shutting it down, even with -m fast. But if you can stop the webservers from initiating new connections before you try and shut down the db, pg_ctl works fine.
Heather Johnson
Senior Database Programmer
New York Post
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Sent: 10/28/2004 12:38 PM
Subject: [ADMIN] pg_ctl stop -m fast
Hi,
One of our customers complains about
pg_ctl stop -m fast
could not shutdown PG server though we cannot reproduce the same problem
here.
They claim only "-m immediate" can take PG down after 10 minutes of
issuing "-m fast".
The PG version is 7.3.2.
What might prevent "-m fast" to shutdown PG (long transaction, etc.)?
What should I do to help the customer solve this issue?
Thanks,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anton Maksimenkov | 2004-10-29 08:40:29 | Re: opportunities of inline funtions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-28 17:10:20 | Re: pg_ctl stop -m fast |