From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: MacOS: xsltproc fails with "warning: failed to load external entity" |
Date: | 2023-02-06 01:25:34 |
Message-ID: | 2563864.1675646734@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I did survey available meson versions, and chose what features to
> use. But not really ninja, since I didn't know about this specific issue
> and other than this the ninja version differences were handled by meson.
> As all the issues are related to more precise dependencies, I somehwat
> wonder if it'd be good enough to use less accurate dependencies with
> 1.8.2. But I don't like it.
Nah, I don't like that either. I did a crude survey of ninja's version
history by seeing which version is in each recent Fedora release:
f20/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.4.0
f21/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.5.1
f22/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.5.3
f23/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.7.1
f24/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.7.2
f25/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.8.2
f26/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.8.2
f27/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.8.2
f28/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.8.2
f29/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.8.2
f30/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.9.0
f31/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.1
f32/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.1
f33/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.2
f34/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.2
f35/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.2
f36/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.2
f37/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.10.2
rawhide/ninja-build.spec:Version: 1.11.1
Remembering that Fedora has a six-month release cycle, this shows that
1.8.2 was around for awhile but 1.9.x was a real flash-in-the-pan.
We can probably get away with saying that you need 1.10 or newer.
That's already three-plus years old.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-02-06 01:46:15 | Re: First draft of back-branch release notes is done |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2023-02-06 01:16:58 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |