Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Date: 2009-02-09 23:49:26
Message-ID: 25630.1234223366@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I think what you propose would be a mistake. We want to encourage
> people to move *away* from OIDS.

Why? I don't agree with that premise, and therefore not with any
of the rest of your argument.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-02-10 00:01:30 Re: database corruption help
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-02-09 22:38:58 Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS