Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Date: 2015-05-15 03:22:25
Message-ID: 2561.1431660145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Separate block sampling functions

>>> This patch broke buildfarm member crake.

>> OK, thanks. I missed that amongst the other unrelated failures. Looking now.

> This needs a patch to file_text_array_fdw which I think is available here:
> https://github.com/adunstan/file_text_array_fdw
> Simon, do you mind if I send a pull request?

TBH, I think that this patch itself was a bad idea and should be reverted.
I don't object to changing APIs used by external modules when there's a
good reason to break them, but having looked at this patch all I see is
change for the sake of change. What new functionality have you introduced?

Or to put it more baldly: it's likely that you've broken quite a large
number of third-party FDWs, not just this one. A lot of people have
probably copied-and-pasted what was in the contrib FDWs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-05-15 03:31:10 Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2015-05-15 03:12:25 Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions