From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions |
Date: | 2015-05-15 03:22:25 |
Message-ID: | 2561.1431660145@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 15 May 2015 at 03:50, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Separate block sampling functions
>>> This patch broke buildfarm member crake.
>> OK, thanks. I missed that amongst the other unrelated failures. Looking now.
> This needs a patch to file_text_array_fdw which I think is available here:
> https://github.com/adunstan/file_text_array_fdw
> Simon, do you mind if I send a pull request?
TBH, I think that this patch itself was a bad idea and should be reverted.
I don't object to changing APIs used by external modules when there's a
good reason to break them, but having looked at this patch all I see is
change for the sake of change. What new functionality have you introduced?
Or to put it more baldly: it's likely that you've broken quite a large
number of third-party FDWs, not just this one. A lot of people have
probably copied-and-pasted what was in the contrib FDWs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-05-15 03:31:10 | Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-05-15 03:12:25 | Re: pgsql: Separate block sampling functions |