From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
Cc: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on 64 bit Linux |
Date: | 2006-08-21 17:05:13 |
Message-ID: | 25603.1156179913@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
>> What re-architecting would be needed?
> I'm asking that it be admitted that it has not been looked at. Not
> seriously. Nor is this unique to PostgreSQL. I expect the performance
> for Linux applications in general to slowly improve on 64-bit
> processors as more and more people begin to use it. I recall a few
> threads on other mailing lists where the primary developers admitted
> to not having ready access to a 64-bit machine. Until they do, the
> chance that these applications are hand-tuned for 64-bit is unlikely.
What you seem to be asking for is that we engage in a lot of
machine-specific tuning for some particular processor or other.
That has not happened and will not happen. This project believes
in portable code, not "optimized for Xeon-of-the-month" code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2006-08-21 17:15:43 | Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Provide 8-byte transaction IDs to |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2006-08-21 17:02:48 | Re: Replication |