Re: another index question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "ADBAAMD" <adba(dot)amdocs(at)bell(dot)ca>
Cc: "Sean Harding" <sharding(at)dogcow(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: another index question
Date: 2001-04-01 22:42:04
Message-ID: 2558.986164924@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"ADBAAMD" <adba(dot)amdocs(at)bell(dot)ca> writes:
> More to the point, shouldn't the statistics on tables plus the syntax be
> enough for the planner to get this (not so complex) query a good plan,
> even if not optimal?

We don't generate very good plans for IN at the moment. This is on the
TODO list.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-04-01 22:51:12 Re: How do I...
Previous Message ADBAAMD 2001-04-01 22:19:26 Re: Ok, why isn't it using *this* index?