Re: NaNs in numeric_power (was Re: Postgres 11 release notes)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Akio Iwaasa <aki-iwaasa(at)vt(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NaNs in numeric_power (was Re: Postgres 11 release notes)
Date: 2018-05-17 15:22:45
Message-ID: 25568.1526570565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Huong Dangminh <huo-dangminh(at)ys(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> writes:
> Thank you. The patch looks fine to me.
> Also, I have done the "make check" in Windows and Linux environment with no problem.

Pushed, thanks for reviewing/testing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2018-05-17 15:26:37 Re: [BUGFIX] amcanbackward is not checked before building backward index paths
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-05-17 14:36:30 Re: Incorrect comment in get_partition_dispatch_recurse

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-05-17 18:23:00 Re: Postgres 11 release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-05-17 14:05:25 SCRAM with channel binding downgrade attack