From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Philip Reimer <phre(at)wi(dot)uni-muenster(dot)de> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: User-Defined Datatypes |
Date: | 2002-04-15 19:04:17 |
Message-ID: | 25556.1018897457@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Philip Reimer <phre(at)wi(dot)uni-muenster(dot)de> writes:
> Is it possible to create new structured datatypes in PostgreSQL like in this
> IBM UDB2 statement:
> create type person_t as (
> name varchar(30),
> car car_t)
> create type car_t as (
> model varchar(30),
> plate carchar(20))
> create table car of car_t
> create table person of person_t
We don't support that syntax, but you can achieve approximately the same
effect using inheritance:
create table person_t ( ... );
create table person () inherits(person_t);
Very often, the parent table of an inheritance relationship isn't
intended to ever actually contain any rows itself. In that case the
parent is effectively serving as a datatype, or at least you could
think of it that way.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Timothy Wood | 2002-04-15 19:08:42 | using CAST and LIKE |
Previous Message | Gunther Schadow | 2002-04-15 18:58:19 | Re: User-Defined Datatypes |