From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: xref labels: "Chapter 33", "Section 33.2" |
Date: | 2015-02-17 02:27:10 |
Message-ID: | 25546.1424140030@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 05:05:39PM +1300, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> I can't seem to make an <xref linkend="spi"> render the <title>...</title>
>> element text. The DocBook documentation implies that this should be the
>> default; e.g. if you have:
> Have you read README.links in the sgml top-level directory?
I think Craig's question is more about our overall house style/policy, ie,
how do we want such links to be rendered? I am definitely *not* in favor
of authors of portions of the docs trying to impose their own opinions on
individual links, which is where his question seems to be leading. But it
is a fair question whether we'd like to change the currently existing
global rendering decision, and if so what would be the best way to
implement that.
I suspect that the answer is different in different output formats,
for example PDF format would probably prefer oldschool chapter/section
numbers even if we go over to names in HTML versions. (Consider the
manual printed on dead trees: named links would be of *zero* value there,
while you could still flip to a numbered section reasonably quickly.)
This is another reason for not thinking that hacking the text link-by-link
is an appropriate answer.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2015-02-17 08:29:09 | bgworker / SPI docs patches |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-02-16 22:08:34 | Re: xref labels: "Chapter 33", "Section 33.2" |