Re: syslogging oddity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: syslogging oddity
Date: 2007-07-23 15:14:50
Message-ID: 25524.1185203690@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Yes, but if we make the message DEBUG1 it won't normally. Still, I think
> we could live with that. I'm not inclined to waste too much time on it.

Yeah. I think the only reason it was LOG initially was because the
syslogger was pretty experimental at the time.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-07-23 15:16:15 Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-07-23 15:12:52 Re: MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF on Windows-32