Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about bit.h and bit.c
Date: 2003-01-06 04:26:37
Message-ID: 25518.1041827197@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> writes:
> Why is it that bit.h is in src/include/utils and bit.c is in
> src/backend/lib ?

Possibly a more interesting question is why haven't we ditched them both
... AFAICT none of the bit.c routines are used anymore.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-01-06 04:41:30 Re: Upgrading rant.
Previous Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2003-01-06 04:14:51 Question about bit.h and bit.c