Re: Memory usage after upgrade to 9.2.4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory usage after upgrade to 9.2.4
Date: 2013-04-21 13:14:08
Message-ID: 25513.1366550048@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> I do have a log with the memory context info printed after the OOM
> killed the session - see it attached.

The only thing that seems rather bloated is the CacheMemoryContext,
which seems to be because the backend has cached info about several
thousand tables and indexes. Given that you say there's 9500 relations
in their schema, it's hard to believe that 9.2.4 is suddenly doing that
where 9.2.3 didn't. I'm wondering if they've done something else that
restricted the amount of memory available to a backend.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Cristian Cruz 2013-04-21 13:37:01 Re: Memory usage after upgrade to 9.2.4
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2013-04-21 12:42:59 Re: Memory usage after upgrade to 9.2.4