From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Hell, Robert" <Robert(dot)Hell(at)fabasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |
Date: | 2008-05-02 21:28:31 |
Message-ID: | 25502.1209763711@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Hell, Robert" <Robert(dot)Hell(at)fabasoft(dot)com> writes:
> This patch adds a GUC parameter for tuple_fraction of cursors (discussed
> earlier here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-04/msg00018.php)
> By setting this parameter the planner's favor to use fast-start plans
> for cursors can be affected.
Applied with some documentation cleanup, and also care for the behavior
at the range endpoints 0 and 1. A user expecting it to act like a
simple fraction would have been quite surprised at the endpoints
(see the header comments for grouping_planner).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-02 21:43:26 | Re: Protection from SQL injection |
Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2008-05-02 21:22:55 | VacAttrStatsP vs VacAttrStats * (typedef'ing pointer types) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-05-02 22:18:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sigh ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-05-02 21:13:38 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC parameter cursors_tuple_fraction |