From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/. configure configure.in |
Date: | 2002-09-07 20:51:43 |
Message-ID: | 25483.1031431903@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I don't understand. Are you trying to save bytes in configure.in? If
> we can make problem resolution easier, why wouldn't we do that?
I think he's saying that trying to narrow down the reasons for a failure
is not configure's job: if we buy into that then we'll soon have a
monstrous configure script with a huge number of essentially duplicative
error checks. That costs maintenance effort, not to mention user time
to run a slower script.
Also, the more such checks we provide in the hope of offering a "more
specific" error message, the greater the chance of providing a message
that is more specific and *wrong*, thus misleading the user and causing
him to waste time instead of save it.
"Look in config.log" is good general-purpose advice for understanding
configure-detected problems. I don't think we should spend effort
on special-casing problems that are adequately explained if one looks
in the log.
What *would* be worth doing if it's feasible is to have configure
automatically spit out the relevant section of config.log when it
finds a problem...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-07 21:21:48 | Re: pgsql-server/. configure configure.in |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian - CVS | 2002-09-07 18:39:05 | pgsql-server/ oc/FAQ_DEV oc/src/FAQ/FAQ_DEV.ht ... |