Re: PAM Authentication and Postgresql 7.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher McNabb <cmcnabb(at)vt(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PAM Authentication and Postgresql 7.3
Date: 2003-01-13 16:05:07
Message-ID: 25471.1042473907@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Christopher McNabb <cmcnabb(at)vt(dot)edu> writes:
> I am trying to set up PAM authentication with postgres 7.3.1.

I'm not a PAM user, but your pg_hba entry seems correct according to the
docs:

> host all all 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 pam
> postgresql

assuming that that's really one line and your message was just
line-wrapped by your mailer.

> 2003-01-13 09:50:37 LOG: parse_hba: invalid syntax in pg_hba.conf file
> at line 92, token "pam"
> 2003-01-13 09:50:37 FATAL: Missing or erroneous pg_hba.conf file, see
> postmaster log for details

This is the behavior I would expect to see if PAM support were not
present in the postmaster. Are you certain that your pg_config file
corresponds to the installed, running postmaster?

Another possibility is that the postmaster has cached a previous version
of pg_hba.conf in which the syntax was indeed incorrect. If you've been
editing pg_hba.conf, did you SIGHUP the postmaster afterwards? ("pg_ctl
reload" is the same as SIGHUP)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message helen liu 2003-01-13 16:44:01 query probelm
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-13 15:58:44 Re: Function problem.