| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Guide to PostgreSQL source tree |
| Date: | 2001-08-19 15:22:08 |
| Message-ID: | 25468.998234528@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca> writes:
> And what's wrong in automated guide generation?
Even more to the point, what's wrong with looking at the source code?
(Why would you want a "line by line" guide if you're not looking at the
source code, anyway?)
We could probably do with more extensive high-level documentation than
we have, to point people to the parts of the code that they need to read
for a particular purpose. But I agree with Sergei that it's hopeless
to try to divorce low-level documentation from the code itself.
One thing that I find absolutely essential for dealing with any large
project is a full-text indexer (I use Glimpse, but I think there are
others out there). Being able to quickly look at every use of a
particular identifier goes a long way towards answering questions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mlw | 2001-08-19 15:23:08 | Re: Multiple parameters on aggregates? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-19 15:13:41 | Re: encoding names |