| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Glen Eustace <geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Mirroring databases in v8 |
| Date: | 2004-10-06 14:06:16 |
| Message-ID: | 25460.1097071576@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Glen Eustace <geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Having read this, it would seem I might be jumping the gun a bit. The
> method given could be used to copy a running database to another system
> but I'm not sure how it would work if the mirrored database is required
> to be online at the same time.
It wouldn't. You can have a "hot spare" database via log shipping, but
there is zero chance of allowing the backup to run any independent
transactions. (If it did, its xact counter and pg_clog would get out of
sync with the master, causing all subsequently copied data to be
invalid. AFAICS, even read-only transactions would be problematic.)
Not sure if you are familiar with the Slony project, but that is
probably your best bet for data propagation to a live slave at present.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pginfo | 2004-10-06 14:17:24 | Re: lower/upper support and cyrillic |
| Previous Message | Justin Wyer | 2004-10-06 13:30:49 | two digit years in inserts |