Re: Maximum Performance Follow-up Question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Radu-Adrian Popescu <radu(dot)popescu(at)aldratech(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter T(dot) Brown" <peter(at)memeticsystems(dot)com>, Postgres Admin List <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maximum Performance Follow-up Question
Date: 2002-01-25 15:23:31
Message-ID: 25432.1011972211@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Radu-Adrian Popescu <radu(dot)popescu(at)aldratech(dot)com> writes:
> I belive you should set
> fsync=false
> in case you mainly select and do inserts rather rare.

No, that's a really horrid reason to turn off fsync. A read-only
transaction never syncs and thus has no fsync penalty. If update
performance isn't a serious problem for you, you may as well keep
fsync on and not have to worry about data loss in the case of a
system crash.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhang, Anna 2002-01-25 16:00:20 Re: Increasing Shared Memory - on MacOS X
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-01-25 12:16:56 Re: Vacuum and Vacuum analyse