From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: waitpid in pg_basebackup |
Date: | 2012-07-04 17:54:47 |
Message-ID: | 25402.1341424487@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> waitpid() is used with "#ifdef HAVE_WAITPID" in reaper(), but NOT in
> BaseBackup().
> Why not? We can ensure that all platforms which PostgreSQL supports
> have waitpid()?
> If so, can we get rid of "#ifdef HAVE_WAITPID" in reaper()?
The Single Unix Spec V2 (1997) specifies both waitpid() and wait3(),
but says the latter is "legacy" and new applications should use only
waitpid(); furthermore it documents that platforms need not support
wait3() (they can just return ENOSYS instead of making it work).
I notice that pgbench also uses waitpid() unconditionally in its
"#ifndef ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY" section. That's been there for
quite some time, making it even less likely that there are still
any platforms where waitpid() isn't available.
I agree, let's drop the support for waitpid() not being present.
It looks to me like we could remove the macro maze in reaper()
completely, if we fixed win32_waitpid() to not have an API randomly
different from the real waitpid(). That would be a noticeable
readability gain there.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-07-04 17:56:48 | Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-04 17:30:25 | Re: enhanced error fields |