| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: removing some dead "keep compiler quiet" code |
| Date: | 2012-11-20 04:09:44 |
| Message-ID: | 25398.1353384584@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Since ereport() can now communicate to the compiler whether it returns
> or not, a fair amount of "keep compiler quiet" code is dead. Since the
> method that ereport() uses is not dependent on any compiler-specific
> attributes, I think this code can just be removed. I propose the
> attached patch.
Meh. This will only work if the compiler understands that abort()
doesn't return --- compilers that don't know that will start bleating
about uninitialized variables again. And the ones that do know it
will be able to throw away the dead code anyway.
I doubt this is a good idea.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2012-11-20 07:22:44 | Re: too much pgbench init output |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-11-20 03:45:56 | removing some dead "keep compiler quiet" code |