| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Knox <segfault(at)hardline(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
| Date: | 2001-03-30 04:58:25 |
| Message-ID: | 25368.985928305@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Knox <segfault(at)hardline(dot)org> writes:
> Well, this patch seems to produce attlens of 6 as desired, but it
> causes many (13) of the regression tests to fail. Do you want to see
> the regression.diffs?
>>
>> Please.
> See attached.
Does look pretty broken, but I don't see how my idea would have led to
all this other stuff failing. Anyway, I guess the path of least
resistance is to install your ARM-specific packing patch. It's
important to make sure that sizeof(ItemPointerData) is 6 if at all
possible, since it will cost you four or so wasted bytes in every
tuple header if it's not. Will take care of it for RC2.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2001-03-30 05:17:50 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: possible row locking bug in 7.0.3 & 7.1 |
| Previous Message | Matthew | 2001-03-30 04:56:19 | RE: User administration tool |