Re: Ambiguous language in Table 8.13. Special Date/Time Inputs [EXT]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: David Harper <adh(at)sanger(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ambiguous language in Table 8.13. Special Date/Time Inputs [EXT]
Date: 2019-07-09 15:58:35
Message-ID: 25367.1562687915@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Yes, I see what you mean now. How is this patch, which uses "zero
> hour"?

Ugh. Are we writing spy novels now?

I actually agree with your opinion that "midnight" is fine.
That text has been that way for over fifteen years[1], and
nobody's complained before that it was ambiguous.

But, if we're going to change it, let's just s/midnight/00:00:00/
and be done. Making up fancy terminology doesn't improve matters.

regards, tom lane

[1] git blame dates the text to commit 1b342df00 of 2002-11-11, and
apparently it was not new then, but I'm too lazy to dig further.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-09 20:53:15 Re: Improvement of GIN figure
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-07-09 15:48:25 Re: Ambiguous language in Table 8.13. Special Date/Time Inputs [EXT]