From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts |
Date: | 2009-08-27 01:02:40 |
Message-ID: | 25365.1251334960@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Has anyone heard of other contexts in which file locks don't
>> work? Has Windows got them?
> Yes. But they are mandatory rather than advisory, I believe.
Probably wouldn't matter for our purposes? I guess what we'd need is a
writer's lock that still allows other processes to read the file.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-08-27 01:27:34 | pgsql: Update release notes for 7.4.26, 8.0.22, 8.1.18, 8.2.14, 8.3.8, |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-08-27 00:59:02 | Re: We should Axe /contrib/start-scripts |