From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Speeding up DELETEs on table with FKs ... |
Date: | 2004-10-11 05:26:57 |
Message-ID: | 25361.1097472417@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> 'k, now that I've seen the error of my ways *groan* I've gone back
> through, and checked for what is referencing that table, and there is only
> one place that is, and it does have an INDEX:
>> explain analyze select * from table where raw_id = 20722;
> QUERY PLAN
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Index Scan using ind_raw_id on table (cost=0.00..3.09 rows=1 width=122) (actual time=0.33..0.33 rows=0 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (raw_id = 20722::numeric)
> Total runtime: 0.37 msec
"numeric", hm? Is the referenced column also of type numeric?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-11 05:38:34 | Re: cvs tip broken build for plpython |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-10-11 01:40:14 | CVS fixed ... |