From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Date: | 2003-09-26 18:25:59 |
Message-ID: | 25357.1064600759@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Perhaps we can throw a warning rather than an error, and adjust initdb
> to be consistent.
I like the idea of reducing the newline consistency check to a warning.
There is one thing we'd have to watch for though (it's already an issue
but would become a bigger one): client-side COPY code had better be
prepared to absorb backend Notice messages while processing COPY IN.
Currently libpq doesn't read input data at all during a COPY IN loop,
which means that if the COPY generates more than a few K of warning
messages, the backend gets blocked on a full pipe and the whole
operation locks up. I have been meaning to fix that in libpq anyway,
but what other client libraries might have the same issue? Anyone know
whether JDBC would need a similar fix?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:27:38 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-26 18:20:33 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:27:38 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-26 18:20:33 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-26 18:27:38 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-09-26 18:20:33 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |