Re: [Testperf-general] Re: 8.0beta5 results w/ dbt2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, testperf-general(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Testperf-general] Re: 8.0beta5 results w/ dbt2
Date: 2004-12-12 06:13:13
Message-ID: 25330.1102831993@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> I never vacuum during the test. Is it possible that all the updates
> and inserts would affect this?

That's bad; first because it possibly *is* hurting performance, and
second because if it isn't, your results could legitimately be attacked
as not representing the long-term-sustainable performance of Postgres.
VACUUM is real, unavoidable overhead and so we have to account for it
honestly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-12-12 06:27:46 Re: [GENERAL] replacing a view: bug or feature?
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-12-12 05:46:57 Re: [Testperf-general] BufferSync and bgwriter