Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Schulz <msc(at)antzsystem(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds
Date: 2013-02-23 16:14:33
Message-ID: 2529.1361636073@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> You can take the query, replace the ? parameter markers with $1, $2, and
> so forth, and explain it with psql like this:

> prepare foo (text) as select * from mytable where id = $1;
> explain analyze execute foo ('foo');

> On 9.2, though, this will explain the specific plan for those
> parameters, so it might not be any different from what you already
> EXPLAINed.

You can tell whether you're getting a generic or custom plan by noting
whether the explain output contains $n symbols or the values you put in.
In 9.2, the first five attempts will always produce custom plans, but
on the sixth and subsequent attempts you will get a generic plan, if
the plancache logic decides that it's not getting any benefit out of
custom plans. Here's a trivial example:

regression=# prepare foo(int) as select * from tenk1 where unique1 = $1;
PREPARE
regression=# explain execute foo(42);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
Index Cond: (unique1 = 42)
(2 rows)

regression=# explain execute foo(42);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 (cost=0.29..8.30 rows=1 width=244)
Index Cond: (unique1 = $1)
(2 rows)

It's switched to a generic plan after observing that the custom plans
weren't any cheaper. Once that happens, subsequent attempts will use
the generic plan. (Of course, in a scenario where the custom plans do
provide a benefit, it'll keep using those.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-02-23 16:15:12 Are bitmap index scans slow to start?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-02-23 15:54:26 Re: BUG: endless lseek(.., SEEK_END) from select queries on x64 builds