| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Recreate Missing WAL Directories (from TODO) |
| Date: | 2008-11-09 17:52:05 |
| Message-ID: | 25289.1226253125@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This has been suggested before but I'm unconvinced that it's a good
>> idea. It's reasonably common for pg_xlog to be a symlink. If you
>> neglect to re-establish the symlink then what would happen is that xlog
>> gets recreated on the data disk, and with no notice you are running in
>> a degraded mode.
> Agreed on the basis that people sometimes forget to symlink. That's
> the reason why I was echoing a message. Initially the message was
> WARNING, but I degraded it to LOG.
Applied with minor stylistic tweaks and documentation update.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2008-11-09 18:56:10 | Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Performance Comparison. |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2008-11-09 17:47:02 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |