Re: Performance Tuning

From: "Darryl W(dot) DeLao Jr(dot)" <ddelao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning
Date: 2006-02-17 20:01:41
Message-ID: 25274f460602171201u60f19c1fob2bad3cd49201d31@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Running ver 7.3.10 in RHEL 3.0 ES. If I change shared buffers, dont i have
to change max connections as well?

On 2/17/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Darryl W. DeLao Jr." <ddelao(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I have max_connections set to 512, with shared buffers set to 1024. If
> I
> > set this any higher, postgres will not start. But, it seems that this
> > setting is not enough. Though the server runs fine, certain queries for
> > reports are taking anywhere from 40 to 55 seconds, and the CPU is only
> > topping out at 25%. Is there a way to make this better?
>
> You really really want shared_buffers higher --- 10000 or so would be
> reasonable. (Which PG version are you running? If 8.1 you might want
> higher than that.)
>
> Fix the kernel's SHMMAX setting to let you do this.
>
> After that, you probably want to read the archives of the
> pgsql-performance list a bit. You likely have a standard query-tuning
> problem, but you've not said enough to let anyone help you.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-02-17 20:06:52 Re: Performance Tuning
Previous Message Chandra Sekhar Surapaneni 2006-02-17 19:57:00 Re: connecting to pgsql