Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> I think the correct fix would have been to change "update sequences"
>> to "update temporary sequences", not to remove it.
> Not sure. The paragraph tries to explain the difference between read
> only transactions and standby.
Right, but what I think it is comparing is a read-only transaction
on the master and a transaction on the standby. The former can do
nextval() on temp sequences, the latter can't.
regards, tom lane