Re: Barman versus pgBackRest

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Date: 2018-09-04 14:52:10
Message-ID: 2524d3b7-5e77-f4c8-2c60-364715a74d93@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 09/04/2018 09:24 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 09/04/2018 07:14 AM, Ron wrote:
>>
>> That was about barman, in the barman group.  This is asking about
>> pgbackrest...  :)
>>
>> So: does pgbackrest have this ability which barman does not have? The
>> "--db-include" option seems to indicate that you can restore a single db,
>> but does indicate whether or not you can rename it.
>
> https://pgbackrest.org/configuration.html#section-restore/option-db-include
>

Which implies that you can't do it?

(Postgres backup/restore capabilities are quite limited, which is disapointing.)

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Poty 2018-09-04 14:58:51 increasing HA
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-09-04 14:24:07 Re: Barman versus pgBackRest