Re: _WINSOCK_DEPRECATED_NO_WARNINGS

Glen Knowles <gknowles(at)ieee(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> but evidently it chose the wrong cutoff for when to enable that
>> symbol, because woodlouse is (or claims to be) running VS2013.

> It's actually checking the wrong thing, the problem is the version of the
> Windows SDK, and while the one installed by default with VS2015 might be
> the right place to cutoff it's not uncommon to have multiple versions of
> the SDK (and VS) in various combinations.

Ah, interesting point --- though it's not clear that woodlouse is actually
running a mixture of SDK/VS releases.

> Or you could just define it unconditionally. :)

Already done that way.

I wonder though if this means the other tests of _MSC_VER in our tree
are wrong?

regards, tom lane