From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: snapshot generation broken |
Date: | 2010-09-22 14:50:14 |
Message-ID: | 25232.1285167014@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I think this should be working now. I made this change to mk-snapshot,
>> and a similar one to mk-stable_snapshot. I have run the snapshot
>> generation for master, and the one for 8.4 should finish in a
>> minute or so. I have disabled the cronjobs until someone else has
>> verified the tarballs.
Do you still need someone to do that, and what do you want done exactly?
>> When I do, I'll also enable generation of snapshots of REL9_0_STABLE.
>> We currently do back to 8.2 - should we keep that, or drop 8.2?
> hmm I would say we should do all supported branches because those are
> the ones that people might be interested in when looking for a fix on a
> branch...
FWIW, I think back to 8.2 is sufficient. The branches earlier than that
are going to be unsupported in a matter of weeks anyway. And if no one
has complained about the lack of nightly tarballs for them to date,
it's unlikely that they'll start complaining now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 14:57:24 | Re: snapshot generation broken |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-22 14:45:30 | Re: SQLSTATE of notice PGresult |