Re: Relation bulk write facility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility
Date: 2024-02-28 22:23:22
Message-ID: 2520881.1709159002@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
> On 28/02/2024 18:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The commit that added that test added a support function
>> "get_columns_length" which is now unused. Should we get rid of that
>> as well?

> I see you just removed it; thanks!

In the no-good-deed-goes-unpunished department: crake is reporting
that this broke our cross-version upgrade tests. I'll go fix that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-02-28 22:54:03 Re: Refactor SASL exchange in preparation for OAuth Bearer
Previous Message David Steele 2024-02-28 21:53:15 Add checkpoint/redo LSNs to recovery errors.