| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Date: | 2015-05-25 19:12:24 |
| Message-ID: | 25188.1432581144@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:03:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As we discussed upthread, if we're trying to minimize cross-branch
>> pgindent differences then we probably need to use the same typedefs
>> list in all branches. I believe Andrew's already set up buildfarm
>> support for generating a unified typedef list for all active branches.
> OK, but just consider that we are then introducing _new_ pgindent
> changes into back branches that have not been modified by patches at
> all.
The point is for the back branches to absorb pgindent-induced changes that
have already happened in HEAD, so I'm not sure what you're getting at.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-25 19:16:15 | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-25 19:08:38 | Re: Run pgindent now? |