Re: GUC with units, details

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GUC with units, details
Date: 2006-07-25 23:00:20
Message-ID: 25181.1153868420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Bort, Paul wrote:
>> [ 1000 vs 1024 ]

> But in this case it's not practical.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought it was fairly common to use
"k" for 1000, "K" for 1024, etc (mnemonic: upper case for the larger
multiplier). So I'd vote for accepting "KB" rather than "kB" ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-07-25 23:20:26 Re: Time zone definitions to config files
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-07-25 22:52:17 Re: GUC with units, details