From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OWNER TO on all objects |
Date: | 2004-06-15 03:55:01 |
Message-ID: | 25176.1087271701@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Then I made it so that pg_dump will output an OWNER TO statement after
> every object creation.
Perhaps better to put these out towards the end of the dump, not right
after the creation of the object? Or is that what you're doing?
I would envision the safest procedure as creating all objects, loading
all data, etc, then all ALTER OWNERs, then all GRANT/REVOKEs.
> * Do we need the set session auth for COPY commands still?
Not if you still own the table while loading into it (see above point).
However, this all assumes a complete dump/restore. Consider data-only
restores. Consider partial restores using pg_restore's options for
that. What happens then? It'd likely be appropriate to issue set
session auth during scenarios involving pre-existing objects.
> * Is there any reason there is no RENAME TO command for operators?
Lack of round tuits, no doubt.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-06-15 04:16:46 | Re: Spinlock assembly cleanup |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-06-15 03:47:14 | Re: building rpms from source rpm's |