From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improving psql slash usage help message |
Date: | 2020-07-12 15:15:56 |
Message-ID: | 2515023.1594566956@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:03 AM David G. Johnston <
> david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 12:29 PM Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> "\dE" displays the list with a "List of relations" heading whereas "\det"
>>> displays "List of foreign tables". So, to differentiate the two, I suggest
>>> to change the help message for "\dE" to:
>>> \dE[S+] [PATTERN] list foreign relations
>> help.c and the documentation need to be synchronized a bit more than this
>> single issue.
>> Calling it "foreign relation" for \dE and "foreign table" for \det does
>> convey that there is a difference - not sure it a huge improvement though.
>> The "\d[Eimstv]" family of meta-commands should, in the help, probably be
>> moved together to show the fact that they are basically "list relation
>> names [of this type only]" while "\det" is "list foreign table info".
FWIW, I agree with David on this point. I find it bizarre and unhelpful
that slashUsage shows \dt, \di, etc as separate commands and fails to
indicate that they can be combined. We could merge these entries into
fprintf(output, _(" \\d[tivmsE][S+] [PATRN] list relations of specified type(s)\n"));
which would both remind people that they can give more than one type,
and shorten the already-overly-long list.
> I think from a user perspective, grouping these wouldn't be helpful. For
> example, it may cause FDW related commands to be spread through out the
> help.
That seems quite irrelevant to this proposal.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-07-12 16:26:34 | Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-07-12 14:29:21 | Re: Avoid useless retrieval of defaults and check constraints in pg_dump -a |