From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search |
Date: | 2008-03-28 05:55:56 |
Message-ID: | 25149.1206683756@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
>> If you can convince me it's a regression I might reconsider, but I
>> rather doubt that 8.2 was better,
> Well, I can't speak for 8.2, but I have a second system crunching the same
> data using the same function on 8.1 (on lesser hardware in fact), and it
> doesn't have these type of issues.
If you can condense it to a test case that is worse on 8.3 than 8.1,
I'm willing to listen...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-03-28 15:00:28 | pgsql: Clarify documentation on PITR and warm standby on the fact that |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-28 05:51:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2008-03-28 06:26:46 | Re: PostgreSQL Replication with read-only access to standby DB |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-28 05:51:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vinubalaji Gopal | 2008-03-28 07:28:33 | Re: vacuum in Postgresql 8.0.x slowing down the database |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-03-28 05:51:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search |