From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
Date: | 2011-02-03 17:46:48 |
Message-ID: | 25146.1296755208@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I don't, however, agree with his contention that this is easy to
> implement. It would be easy to implement something that sucked. It
> would be hard to implement something that actually helped in the cases
> where the existing settings aren't already sufficient.
Exactly. A hint system that actually did more good than harm would be a
very nontrivial project. IMO such effort is better spent on making the
optimizer smarter.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-02-03 17:50:08 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2011-02-03 17:44:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-03 17:52:34 | Re: Exhaustive list of what takes what locks |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2011-02-03 17:44:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |