Re: postgresql in FreeBSD jails: proposal

Mischa Sandberg <mischa_sandberg(at)telus(dot)net> writes:
> + /* In a FreeBSD jail, you can't "kill -0" a postmaster
> + * running in a different jail, so the shm seg might
> + * still be in use. Safer to test nattch ?
> + */
> + if (kill(1,0) && errno == ESRCH && !PGSharedMemoryIsInUse(0,NextShmSegID))
> + continue;

Isn't the last part of that test backward? If it isn't, I don't
understand what it's for at all.

regards, tom lane