Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, panam <panam(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation
Date: 2011-06-01 21:02:51
Message-ID: 25112.1306962171@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> exact, thanks to your last email I read more the code and get the same
> conclusion and put it in a more appropriate place : before
> ExecScanHashBucket.

> I was about sending it, so it is attached.

Applied with cosmetic adjustments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-01 21:10:01 Re: Bad UI design: pg_ctl and data_directory
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-01 20:58:36 Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-06-01 21:15:24 Re: Problem query
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-06-01 20:58:36 Re: [PERFORM] Hash Anti Join performance degradation