Re: Raise a WARNING if a REVOKE affects nothing?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raise a WARNING if a REVOKE affects nothing?
Date: 2012-10-04 14:32:59
Message-ID: 25110.1349361179@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Just to ask a possibly stupid question: why is attempting to a REVOKE
> a non-existent privilege anything other than an ERROR?

Because the SQL standard says so?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit kapila 2012-10-04 14:33:53 Re: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous Message Jon Nelson 2012-10-04 14:19:32 Re: xmalloc => pg_malloc