From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> |
Cc: | Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: obsolete indexing method "rtree" |
Date: | 2020-08-05 14:01:28 |
Message-ID: | 2510904.1596636088@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> writes:
> We removed the indexing method "rtree" in version 8.3 and replaced it
> with "gist". Until today there are some "rtree" heritages:
> * "CREATE INDEX ... USING rtree ..." is valid syntax and leads to the
> message "NOTICE: substituting access method gist for obsolete
> method rtree"
> * The documentation refers to the method in ref/comments.sgml and
> ref/create_index.sgml.
> * The documentation uses the term "R-Tree" in gist.sgml, seg.sgml, and
> xindex.sgml. That's ok because in this cases it refers to the
> abstract concept of R-trees and not to the eliminated implementation.
> Isn't it time to disallow this syntax and remove all references and
> messages?
Why? It's not hurting anything to continue the substitution in CREATE
INDEX. The example in comments.sgml is just an example, and is not
meant to reflect a built-in object any more than the adjacent examples
are.
Possibly the comment in seg.sgml should be adjusted to refer to GiST
indexes --- but then again, it's not entirely clear whether it's even
still relevant for GiST indexes. Perhaps it's talking about a deficiency
that was specific to the old rtree code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-08-05 21:12:43 | Re: Typo in the Section "3.6. Inheritance" |
Previous Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2020-08-05 11:30:39 | obsolete indexing method "rtree" |